← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trey Bagwell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-03-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Aberdeen Wings NAHL 36 3 4 7 0.194 0.0770 0.0790 0.2041 0.2095
2017-18 NAHL 54 13 10 23 0.426 0.1687 0.1648 0.4472 0.4369
2018-19 Houston Bulls NAHL 58 13 21 34 0.586 0.2323 0.2166 0.6155 0.5738
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Wisconsin-River Falls D1 BigTen FR 18 5 0 5 0.278
2019-20 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 18 5 0 5 0.278
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2019-20 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+65.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31921
Forward overall
#1597
Forward born in 1998
#3022
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2011-12
0.862 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2011-12
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2018-19
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.