| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Odessa Jackalopes | NAHL | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2016-17 | Aberdeen Wings | NAHL | 36 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0.194 | 0.0770 | 0.0790 | 0.2041 | 0.2095 |
| 2017-18 | — | NAHL | 54 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 0.426 | 0.1687 | 0.1648 | 0.4472 | 0.4369 |
| 2018-19 | Houston Bulls | NAHL | 58 | 13 | 21 | 34 | 0.586 | 0.2323 | 0.2166 | 0.6155 | 0.5738 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-20 | Wisconsin-River Falls | D1 | BigTen | FR | 18 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.278 |
| 2019-20 | Wisconsin-River Falls | D3 | BigTen | FR | 18 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.278 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.