IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Kamer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-05-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Powell River Kings BCHL 40 3 8 11 0.275 0.1060 0.1094 0.4000 0.4127
2015-16 Powell River Kings BCHL 55 18 16 34 0.618 0.2382 0.2330 0.8991 0.8794
2016-17 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 57 17 26 43 0.754 0.2772 0.2600 0.7973 0.7478
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Michigan State D1 BigTen SR 7 0 1 1 0.143
2019-20 Michigan State D1 BigTen JR 34 1 1 2 0.059
2018-19 Michigan State D1 BigTen SO 22 2 1 3 0.136
2017-18 Michigan State D1 BigTen FR 29 1 1 2 0.069
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2017-18 · Michigan State
-67.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23797
Forward overall
#960
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Melligan
Buffalo State · 2010-11
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Ratzloff
Augsburg · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Gonzalez
Keene State · 2023-24
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.