IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Caleb Hite Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-02-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 55 14 18 32 0.582 0.2138 0.2082 0.6141 0.5981
2017-18 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 60 19 21 40 0.667 0.2449 0.2264 0.7037 0.6506
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA — 27 5 6 11 0.407
2021-22 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA — 29 1 6 7 0.241
2020-21 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA SO 24 4 1 5 0.208
2018-19 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA FR 19 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20929
Forward overall
#948
Forward born in 1997
#1442
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kerfalla Touré
Elmira · 2021-22
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Menzies
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Gallagher
King's · 2022-23
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.