| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Vermont Lumberjacks | EHL | 39 | 7 | 30 | 37 | 0.949 | 0.2191 | 0.2375 | 0.4642 | 0.5031 |
| 2016-17 | Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights | NAHL | 53 | 8 | 19 | 27 | 0.509 | 0.1872 | 0.1907 | 0.5377 | 0.5478 |
| 2017-18 | — | NAHL | 53 | 8 | 27 | 35 | 0.660 | 0.2426 | 0.2352 | 0.6971 | 0.6757 |
| 2018-19 | Kenai River Brown Bears | NAHL | 60 | 12 | 25 | 37 | 0.617 | 0.2266 | 0.2095 | 0.6509 | 0.6018 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-23 | Alaska Fairbanks | D1 | WCHA | — | 34 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 0.324 |
| 2021-22 | Alaska Fairbanks | D1 | WCHA | — | 31 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0.226 |
| 2020-21 | Alaska Fairbanks | D1 | WCHA | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2019-20 | Alaska Fairbanks | D1 | WCHA | FR | 35 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.114 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.