← New Search ↗ Social Card

Markuss Komuls Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-01-04 Country: Latvia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 39 7 30 37 0.949 0.2191 0.2375 0.4642 0.5031
2016-17 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 53 8 19 27 0.509 0.1872 0.1907 0.5377 0.5478
2017-18 NAHL 53 8 27 35 0.660 0.2426 0.2352 0.6971 0.6757
2018-19 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 60 12 25 37 0.617 0.2266 0.2095 0.6509 0.6018
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA 34 3 8 11 0.324
2021-22 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA 31 3 4 7 0.226
2020-21 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA FR 35 2 2 4 0.114
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2019-20 · Alaska Fairbanks
-44.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4776
Defenseman overall
#1071
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salve Regina · 2014-15
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Suffolk · 2014-15
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.