IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Vince Marino Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-09-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Knights NAHL 44 11 12 23 0.523 0.1920 0.2024 0.5517 0.5817
2017-18 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 58 16 26 42 0.724 0.2660 0.2673 0.7643 0.7681
2018-19 — NAHL 50 15 17 32 0.640 0.2351 0.2257 0.6755 0.6486
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Salve Regina D3 CNE — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Salve Regina D3 CNE — 21 5 10 15 0.714
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.71
2019-20 · Salve Regina
+244.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

52%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20540
Forward overall
#989
Forward born in 1998
#1385
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Collin Kerchoff
Concordia (WI) · 2021-22
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Zeke Costello
Nichols · 2005-06
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Rhett Evjen
Stevenson · 2022-23
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.