| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Fairbanks Ice Dogs | NAHL | 52 | 5 | 13 | 18 | 0.346 | 0.1372 | 0.1342 | 0.3635 | 0.3557 |
| 2017-18 | Fairbanks Ice Dogs | NAHL | 43 | 4 | 18 | 22 | 0.512 | 0.2027 | 0.1883 | 0.5371 | 0.4989 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Aurora | D3 | NCHA | SR | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.333 |
| 2020-21 | Aurora | D1 | — | JR | 11 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 0.727 |
| 2020-21 | Aurora | D3 | NCHA | JR | 11 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 0.727 |
| 2019-20 | Aurora | D1 | — | SO | 25 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 0.800 |
| 2019-20 | Aurora | D3 | NCHA | SO | 25 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 0.800 |
| 2018-19 | Aurora | D1 | — | FR | 27 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 0.370 |
| 2018-19 | Aurora | D3 | NCHA | FR | 27 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 0.370 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.