IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Frank Sullivan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-02-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 — USPHL-Premier-Classic 47 3 8 11 0.234 0.0657 0.0686 0.1924 0.2010
2015-16 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 49 8 8 16 0.327 0.1095 0.1053 0.3021 0.2906
2016-17 Janesville Jets NAHL 50 7 10 17 0.340 0.1249 0.1157 0.3589 0.3325
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Salve Regina D3 CNE JR 20 2 4 6 0.300
2018-19 Salve Regina D3 CNE SO 17 0 5 5 0.294
2017-18 Salve Regina D3 CNE FR 22 6 6 12 0.545
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.55
2017-18 · Salve Regina
+418.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15385
Defenseman overall
#2003
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Williams
Westfield State · 2021-22
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Daluisio
UMass Boston · 2018-19
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Levi Carter
Concordia · 2023-24
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.