← New Search ↗ Social Card

Davis Kirkendall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-04-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Wayzata High USHS-MN 25 4 2 6 0.240 0.0296 0.0282 0.0583 0.0556
2016-17 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 48 4 11 15 0.312 0.1110 0.1090 0.3281 0.3221
2017-18 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 57 10 10 20 0.351 0.1246 0.1161 0.3684 0.3434
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Lawrence D3 NCHA 26 5 4 9 0.346
2020-21 Lawrence D1 ECAC JR 9 4 4 8 0.889
2020-21 Lawrence D3 NCHA 9 4 4 8 0.889
2019-20 Saint John's D1 SO 24 10 8 18 0.750
2019-20 Saint John's D3 24 10 8 18 0.750
2018-19 Saint John's D1 FR 27 6 8 14 0.518
2018-19 Saint John's D3 27 6 8 14 0.518
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2018-19 · Saint John's
+434.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#42964
Forward overall
#2129
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Curry · 2012-13
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2015-16
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.