← New Search ↗ Social Card

Davis Kirkendall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-04-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Wayzata High USHS-MN 25 4 2 6 0.240 0.0304 0.0290 0.0583 0.0556
2016-17 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 48 4 11 15 0.312 0.1148 0.1127 0.3303 0.3242
2017-18 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 57 10 10 20 0.351 0.1289 0.1201 0.3709 0.3457
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Lawrence D3 NCHA — 26 5 4 9 0.346
2020-21 Lawrence D1 ECAC JR 9 4 4 8 0.889
2020-21 Lawrence D3 NCHA — 9 4 4 8 0.889
2019-20 Saint John's D3 MIAC — 24 10 8 18 0.750
2018-19 Saint John's D3 MIAC — 27 6 8 14 0.518
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2018-19 · Saint John's
+416.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#43435
Forward overall
#2153
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2013-14
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.