← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lucas Carroll Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-01-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 St. Francis High USHS-MN 25 16 17 33 1.320 0.1626 0.1535 0.3206 0.3026
2015-16 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 39 15 9 24 0.615 0.0681 0.0690 0.1950 0.1976
2016-17 NAHL 48 2 8 10 0.208 0.0740 0.0719 0.2187 0.2124
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Wisconsin-Stout D1 BigTen SR 11 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SR 11 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Wisconsin-Stout D1 BigTen JR 27 2 3 5 0.185
2019-20 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen JR 27 2 3 5 0.185
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stout D1 BigTen SO 23 7 7 14 0.609
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SO 23 7 7 14 0.609
2017-18 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen FR 26 3 5 8 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2017-18 · Wisconsin-Stout
+407.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#34296
Forward overall
#1631
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint John's · 2015-16
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2003-04
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2016-17
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.