IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Marcus Chorney Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-09-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 — NAHL 38 2 6 8 0.210 0.0773 0.0776 0.2225 0.2233
2017-18 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 60 7 22 29 0.483 0.1776 0.1695 0.5108 0.4875
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SR 42 3 5 8 0.191
2020-21 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC JR 28 1 2 3 0.107
2019-20 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC SO 12 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11060
Defenseman overall
#1812
Defenseman born in 1997
#3868
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adam Beauvais
SUNY Brockport · 2021-22
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Wendorf
Hamline · 2016-17
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jonathan Waring
Endicott · 2016-17
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.