IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Wilhelm Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-02-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 16 2 5 7 0.438 0.1733 0.1775 0.4593 0.4704
2017-18 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 58 4 10 14 0.241 0.0956 0.0932 0.2534 0.2470
2018-19 — NAHL 34 1 2 3 0.088 0.0349 0.0325 0.0926 0.0861
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC JR 21 1 5 6 0.286
2020-21 Saint Mary's (MN) D1 — SO 8 0 6 6 0.750
2020-21 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 — SO 8 0 6 6 0.750
2019-20 Saint Mary's (MN) D1 — FR 25 3 13 16 0.640
2019-20 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 — FR 25 3 13 16 0.640
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2019-20 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+1094.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
72%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19389
Defenseman overall
#2716
Defenseman born in 1998
#5765
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Anthony Yurkins
Aurora · 2018-19
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Vito Aluia
Lake Forest · 2014-15
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Giles
Wisconsin-Stout · 2008-09
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.