IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joey Moore Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-05-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 22 2 4 6 0.273 0.0969 0.1004 0.2876 0.2981
2017-18 Amarillo Wranglers NAHL 18 2 1 3 0.167 0.0592 0.0584 0.1758 0.1735
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 14 0 2 2 0.143
2020-21 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Hamilton D1 NESCAC SO 19 1 6 7 0.368
2019-20 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SO 19 1 6 7 0.368
2018-19 Hamilton D1 NESCAC FR 25 2 10 12 0.480
2018-19 Hamilton D3 NESCAC FR 25 2 10 12 0.480
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2018-19 · Hamilton
+645.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#34629
Forward overall
#1730
Forward born in 1998
#3370
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

John O'Brien
Western New England · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Covach
Plymouth State · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Dunn
Fredonia · 2014-15
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.