IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anton Rubtsov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-03-06 Country: Russia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 15 1 5 6 0.400 0.1421 0.1531 0.4200 0.4524
2018-19 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 49 9 14 23 0.469 0.1667 0.1639 0.4928 0.4844
2019-20 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 31 7 11 18 0.581 0.2062 0.2062 0.6096 0.6096
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Alaska Fairbanks D1 — — 13 3 1 4 0.308
2023-24 Alaska Fairbanks D1 — — 30 8 20 28 0.933
2022-23 Alaska Fairbanks D1 — — 33 5 12 17 0.515
2021-22 Alaska Fairbanks D1 — — 24 9 9 18 0.750
2020-21 Alaska Fairbanks D1 WCHA — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28170
Forward overall
#1472
Forward born in 1999
#2401
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Auggie Moore
Saint John's · 2017-18
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Steve Eastman
Bethel · 2003-04
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Steven Mohler
Curry · 2006-07
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.