← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ty Ebner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-10-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Coulee Region Chill NA3HL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 31 2 2 4 0.129 0.0474 0.0478 0.1362 0.1373
2017-18 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 56 10 10 20 0.357 0.1312 0.1258 0.3769 0.3614
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 26 4 6 10 0.385
2020-21 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 4 1 1 2 0.500
2019-20 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 26 7 9 16 0.615
2018-19 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 20 5 2 7 0.350
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2018-19 · Gustavus Adolphus
+332.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#45592
Forward overall
#2264
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aurora · 2023-24
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2024-25
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.