IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ty Ebner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-10-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Coulee Region Chill NA3HL 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2016-17 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 31 2 2 4 0.129 0.0479 0.0483 0.1366 0.1377
2017-18 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 56 10 10 20 0.357 0.1326 0.1271 0.3781 0.3625
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 26 4 6 10 0.385
2020-21 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 4 1 1 2 0.500
2019-20 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 26 7 9 16 0.615
2018-19 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 20 5 2 7 0.350
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2018-19 · Gustavus Adolphus
+327.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
40%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38691
Forward overall
#1818
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Donnie Hallmark
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2008-09
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Hall
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2012-13
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
David DuBord
St. Thomas · 2000-01
0.679 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.