IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will LeNeave Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-09-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Orono High USHS-MN 25 10 19 29 1.160 0.3123 0.2898 0.2818 0.2615
2015-16 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 58 6 11 17 0.293 0.0837 0.0829 0.2269 0.2248
2016-17 Nanaimo Clippers BCHL 36 4 8 12 0.333 0.1297 0.1225 0.4861 0.4591
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 5 1 1 2 0.400
2019-20 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 26 3 8 11 0.423
2018-19 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 24 1 7 8 0.333
2017-18 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 26 2 9 11 0.423
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2017-18 · Gustavus Adolphus
+320.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#16229
Defenseman overall
#2075
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Jake Flynn
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UConn (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Zink
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mat Hehr
Fredonia · 2008-09
1.300 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Walinski
Salve Regina · 2018-19
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Araujo
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2017-18
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.