← New Search ↗ Social Card

Taylor Lantz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-06-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Greenway High USHS-MN 15 7 7 14 0.933 0.1182 0.1199 0.2267 0.2300
2016-17 Austin Bruins NAHL 2 0 2 2 1.000 0.3674 0.3827 1.0555 1.0996
2017-18 Minot Minotauros NAHL 46 4 14 18 0.391 0.1438 0.1427 0.4130 0.4098
2018-19 Minot Minotauros NAHL 52 15 29 44 0.846 0.3109 0.2946 0.8932 0.8464
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA FR 31 2 8 10 0.323
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2019-20 · Alaska Anchorage
+61.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

65%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
25%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19998
Forward overall
#961
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Mary's (MN) · 2017-18
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2000-01
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Trine · 2018-19
0.929 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.