← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Clemons Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Prior Lake High USHS-MN 25 20 17 37 1.480 0.1823 0.1835 0.3595 0.3618
2016-17 Mason City Toros NA3HL 43 33 32 65 1.512 0.1672 0.1714
2017-18 Mason City Toros NA3HL 30 24 30 54 1.800 0.1991 0.1940 0.2625 0.2584
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC GR 25 5 8 13 0.520
2020-21 Gustavus Adolphus D1 JR 5 1 0 1 0.200
2020-21 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 5 1 0 1 0.200
2019-20 Gustavus Adolphus D1 SO 26 9 14 23 0.885
2019-20 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 26 9 14 23 0.885
2018-19 Wisconsin-River Falls D1 BigTen FR 17 0 1 1 0.059
2018-19 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 17 0 1 1 0.059
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2018-19 · Wisconsin-River Falls
-62.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
75%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9299
Forward overall
#418
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Skidmore · 2023-24
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2017-18
0.191 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2014-15
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.