IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brendan Sheehan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-05-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Minot Minotauros NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 — NAHL 12 1 1 2 0.167 0.0619 0.0610 0.1765 0.1739
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Hamline D3 MIAC SR 26 7 9 16 0.615
2020-21 Hamline D3 MIAC JR 6 2 2 4 0.667
2019-20 Hamline D3 MIAC SO 12 1 4 5 0.417
2018-19 Hamline D3 MIAC FR 21 3 1 4 0.191
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2018-19 · Hamline
+264.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35333
Forward overall
#1560
Forward born in 1998
#4454
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Mike Robinson
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ New Hampshire
0.11 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.14 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sam Williams
St. Scholastica · 2012-13
0.192 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Stewart Bell
Tufts · 2011-12
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Craig Simchuk
Manhattanville · 2008-09
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.