IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brady Gaudette Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-03-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Northeast Generals NAHL 57 10 17 27 0.474 0.1740 0.1791 0.5007 0.5154
2018-19 Northeast Generals NAHL 57 14 16 30 0.526 0.1934 0.1904 0.5562 0.5477
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Norwich D3 LittleEast — 28 5 5 10 0.357
2021-22 Norwich D3 LittleEast — 10 3 2 5 0.500
2020-21 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 13 2 0 2 0.154
2019-20 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 6 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
35%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28363
Forward overall
#1489
Forward born in 1999
#2449
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Taylor Portner
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Maucieri
St. Thomas · 2018-19
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Mitch Shaheen
Endicott · 2017-18
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.