IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Taylor Portner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-02-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Port Huron Fighting Falcons NAHL 2 0 1 1 0.500 0.1857 0.1904 0.5294 0.5429
2011-12 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 19 7 2 9 0.474 0.1759 0.1717 0.5016 0.4896
2012-13 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 54 11 13 24 0.444 0.1650 0.1528 0.4705 0.4357
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Saint Mary's D3 — SR 24 9 10 19 0.792
2015-16 Saint Mary's D3 — JR 14 3 5 8 0.571
2014-15 Saint Mary's D3 — SO 27 9 11 20 0.741
2013-14 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 5 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#24622
Forward overall
#1079
Forward born in 1992
#2670
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aaron Ryback
Concordia · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Gavin Bloder
Fredonia · 2023-24
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor Veneklase
SUNY Cortland · 2018-19
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.