← New Search ↗ Social Card

Erik Palmqvist Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-07-20 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Skellefteå AIK U20 SHL-J20 33 1 9 10 0.303 0.1684 0.1692 0.4037 0.4056
2017-18 Janesville Jets NAHL 50 7 18 25 0.500 0.1837 0.1830 0.5278 0.5258
2018-19 Janesville Jets NAHL 59 9 13 22 0.373 0.1370 0.1304 0.3936 0.3745
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Augsburg D3 MIAC GR 25 7 16 23 0.920
2022-23 Augsburg D3 MIAC SR 28 11 9 20 0.714
2021-22 Augsburg D3 MIAC JR 26 7 9 16 0.615
2020-21 Augsburg D1 MIAC SO 5 1 3 4 0.800
2020-21 Augsburg D3 MIAC SO 5 1 3 4 0.800
2019-20 Augsburg D1 MIAC FR 19 3 8 11 0.579
2019-20 Augsburg D3 MIAC FR 19 3 8 11 0.579
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.58
2019-20 · Augsburg
+346.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33266
Forward overall
#1664
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Johnson & Wales · 2023-24
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2017-18
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2018-19
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.