← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin Stevens Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-07-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 CCHL 60 3 9 12 0.200 0.0434 0.0424 0.1547 0.1512
2017-18 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 50 6 22 28 0.560 0.1215 0.1125 0.4333 0.4012
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast 22 2 12 14 0.636
2021-22 Plymouth State D3 LittleEast 15 2 8 10 0.667
2020-21 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC GR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 24 3 4 7 0.292
2018-19 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 10 1 4 5 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2018-19 · Connecticut College
+527.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
55%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12814
Defenseman overall
#1962
Defenseman born in 1997
#1081
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2006-07
0.714 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2015-16
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.