← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack O'Leary Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-03-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 45 7 15 22 0.489 0.2884 0.2878 1.4684 1.4655
2019-20 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 46 10 17 27 0.587 0.3463 0.3463 1.7630 1.7630
2020-21 Lincoln Stars USHL 47 11 21 32 0.681 0.4017 0.4017 2.0450 2.0450
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Cornell D1 ECAC SR 35 8 9 17 0.486
2023-24 Cornell D1 ECAC JR 35 7 8 15 0.429
2022-23 Cornell D1 ECAC SO 29 6 11 17 0.586
2021-22 Cornell D1 ECAC FR 11 1 1 2 0.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2021-22 · Cornell
-26.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

80%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10691
Forward overall
#443
Forward born in 2000
#944
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Maine (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.53 PPG
→ Arizona State (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Bentley (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.36 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Plymouth State · 2018-19
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2009-10
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2015-16
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.