IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Hinterser Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-06-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 49 5 8 13 0.265 0.0942 0.0934 0.2785 0.2761
2018-19 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 23 5 6 11 0.478 0.1699 0.1608 0.5022 0.4753
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC SR 22 4 3 7 0.318
2021-22 St. Scholastica D3 MIAC JR 23 7 10 17 0.739
2020-21 St. Scholastica D1 — SO 15 6 9 15 1.000
2020-21 St. Scholastica D3 — SO 15 6 9 15 1.000
2019-20 St. Scholastica D1 — FR 27 6 5 11 0.407
2019-20 St. Scholastica D3 — FR 27 6 5 11 0.407
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.41
2019-20 · St. Scholastica
+255.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#35717
Forward overall
#1814
Forward born in 1998
#3564
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Caleb Suderman
Concordia · 2009-10
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Casper Dyrssen
Manhattanville · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
C.J. Valerian
New England College · 2015-16
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.