IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Osborne Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-02-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 47 3 10 13 0.277 0.1016 0.1040 0.2920 0.2988
2018-19 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 59 7 19 26 0.441 0.1619 0.1584 0.4652 0.4552
2019-20 — NAHL 51 8 17 25 0.490 0.1801 0.1801 0.5174 0.5174
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA — 11 0 1 1 0.091
2022-23 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA — 19 0 4 4 0.210
2021-22 Saint John's D3 MIAC SO 24 5 5 10 0.417
2020-21 St. Thomas D3 CCHA FR 7 0 2 2 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2020-21 · St. Thomas
+121.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
12%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8883
Defenseman overall
#1787
Defenseman born in 1999
#3184
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Olson
Stevenson · 2018-19
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrue Trelstad
Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Reinholz
Hamline · 2012-13
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.