← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lucas Andersson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-04-19 Country: Sweden
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Djurgårdens IF U20 SHL-J20 36 1 6 7 0.194 0.1074 0.1069 0.2589 0.2576
2016-17 Valley Jr. Warriors EHL 39 3 13 16 0.410 0.0601 0.0603 0.2010 0.2016
2017-18 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 55 5 6 11 0.200 0.0711 0.0664 0.2110 0.1970
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Nichols D3 CNE SR 25 1 6 7 0.280
2020-21 Nichols D1 CNE JR 4 1 2 3 0.750
2020-21 Nichols D3 CNE JR 4 1 2 3 0.750
2019-20 Nichols D1 CNE SO 26 2 8 10 0.385
2019-20 Nichols D3 CNE SO 26 2 8 10 0.385
2018-19 Nichols D1 CNE FR 26 2 3 5 0.192
2018-19 Nichols D3 CNE FR 26 2 3 5 0.192
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2018-19 · Nichols
+218.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16081
Defenseman overall
#2259
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2002-03
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Boston · 2016-17
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2014-15
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.