IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Riley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-04-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Premier-Classic 42 10 8 18 0.429 0.1203 0.1207 0.3530 0.3542
2016-17 — USPHL-Premier-Classic 31 7 7 14 0.452 0.1268 0.1211 0.3719 0.3551
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 UMass Boston D3 NEHC JR 24 12 8 20 0.833
2018-19 UMass Boston D3 NEHC SO 15 1 2 3 0.200
2017-18 UMass Boston D3 NEHC FR 23 5 5 10 0.435
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2017-18 · UMass Boston
+320.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#41672
Forward overall
#1861
Forward born in 1996
#188
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dominic Brenza
Stevenson · 2015-16
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Jackson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Evan Pahos
St. Scholastica · 2023-24
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.