← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jackson Nauss Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-08-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Melville Millionaires SJHL 41 2 4 6 0.146 0.0446 0.0469 0.1084 0.1139
2017-18 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 46 6 4 10 0.217 0.0861 0.0863 0.2282 0.2286
2018-19 NAHL 57 7 11 18 0.316 0.1251 0.1197 0.3316 0.3174
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC GR 25 1 4 5 0.200
2022-23 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SR 25 2 2 4 0.160
2020-21 Wisconsin-River Falls D1 BigTen SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen SO 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Wisconsin-River Falls D1 BigTen FR 29 4 9 13 0.448
2019-20 Wisconsin-River Falls D3 BigTen FR 29 4 9 13 0.448
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2019-20 · Wisconsin-River Falls
+392.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#47848
Forward overall
#2608
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Castleton · 2007-08
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2014-15
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2015-16
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.