IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

EMack Bentley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-08-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHL 34 3 17 20 0.588 0.2070 0.2211 0.2884 0.3081
2017-18 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 35 4 6 10 0.286 0.1132 0.1131 0.3000 0.2997
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Middlebury D3 NESCAC GR 24 0 4 4 0.167
2021-22 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SR 22 4 9 13 0.591
2020-21 Middlebury D3 NESCAC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Middlebury D1 — SO 25 6 12 18 0.720
2019-20 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SO 25 6 12 18 0.720
2018-19 Middlebury D1 — FR 21 5 4 9 0.429
2018-19 Middlebury D3 NESCAC FR 21 5 4 9 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2018-19 · Middlebury
+220.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36303
Forward overall
#1853
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeffrey Rubino
Framingham State · 2005-06
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Clay Berger
Tufts · 2014-15
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
C.J. Stubbs
SUNY Morrisville · 2013-14
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.