IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Sampson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-08-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 3 0 2 2 0.667 0.2641 0.2643 0.7000 0.7005
2018-19 — NAHL 32 5 6 11 0.344 0.1362 0.1302 0.3610 0.3451
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Marian D3 NCHA SR 27 10 18 28 1.037
2021-22 Marian D3 NCHA JR 22 3 16 19 0.864
2020-21 Marian D1 — SO 19 4 2 6 0.316
2020-21 Marian D3 NCHA SO 19 4 2 6 0.316
2019-20 Marian D1 — FR 10 0 1 1 0.100
2019-20 Marian D3 NCHA FR 10 0 1 1 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2019-20 · Marian
-36.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31600
Forward overall
#1583
Forward born in 1998
#2968
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cam Symons
SUNY Oswego · 2022-23
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Roberts Baranovskis
Aurora · 2017-18
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brycon Johnson
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.