IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Hutton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-04-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 — NAHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0525 0.0541 0.1510 0.1557
2018-19 Odessa Jackalopes NAHL 45 2 7 9 0.200 0.0735 0.0725 0.2114 0.2085
2019-20 — NAHL 51 11 7 18 0.353 0.1297 0.1297 0.3730 0.3730
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Robert Morris D1 AHA — 3 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SO 19 5 10 15 0.789
2020-21 Robert Morris D1 AHA FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
65%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36719
Forward overall
#2015
Forward born in 1999
#3742
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jason McAloon
Lake Forest · 2009-10
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Xavier Vaillancourt
Wentworth · 2023-24
0.450 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Mulrenin
Hamline · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.