IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Xavier Vaillancourt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-03-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Tabor NE-Prep 25 11 11 22 0.880 0.1743 0.1743 0.4009 0.4009
2022-23 Tabor NE-Prep 27 6 12 18 0.667 0.1321 0.1321 0.3037 0.3037
2023-24 South Shore Kings NCDC 39 11 7 18 0.462 0.1882 0.1856 0.3710 0.3659
2024-25 South Shore Kings NCDC 55 20 21 41 0.746 0.3039 0.2862 0.5992 0.5644
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wentworth D3 CNE FR 20 6 3 9 0.450
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2025-26 · Wentworth
+113.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12801
Forward overall
#587
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Max Bobrow
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2009-10
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Neal
Salve Regina · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Woolley
Salem State · 2018-19
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.