← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tim Lopez Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-02-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 12 0 1 1 0.083 0.0306 0.0314 0.0879 0.0903
2019-20 Express Hockey Club EHL 45 15 28 43 0.956 0.2207 0.2207 0.4676 0.4676
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 New England College D3 LittleEast 18 2 0 2 0.111
2022-23 New England College D3 LittleEast 24 0 3 3 0.125
2021-22 New England College D3 LittleEast 23 5 3 8 0.348
2020-21 Gustavus Adolphus D1 MIAC FR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#29473
Forward overall
#1541
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Bentley (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2017-18
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2021-22
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.