IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Drew Lorinchak Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-10-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 South Shore Kings NCDC 40 4 13 17 0.425 0.1733 0.1749 0.3416 0.3448
2019-20 New Mexico Ice Wolves NAHL 42 6 7 13 0.309 0.1137 0.1137 0.3267 0.3267
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Endicott D3 CNE SR 24 2 2 4 0.167
2022-23 Endicott D3 CNE JR 21 1 2 3 0.143
2021-22 Endicott D3 CNE SO 26 3 6 9 0.346
2020-21 Endicott D1 CNE FR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Endicott D3 CNE FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
40%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31546
Forward overall
#1692
Forward born in 1999
#2941
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Dylan Gareau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Landon Smith
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sebastian Weberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Colgate
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mario Tropea
Neumann · 2016-17
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chad Bennett
Fredonia · 2010-11
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Akezhan Melis
Albertus Magnus · 2022-23
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.