IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rece Bergeman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-02-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 New Jersey Jr. Titans NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 Philadelphia Little Flyers EHL 33 12 23 35 1.061 0.2450 0.2425 0.5190 0.5137
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC — 25 13 10 23 0.920
2021-22 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC — 24 8 17 25 1.042
2019-20 Fitchburg State D1 MASCAC FR 24 4 12 16 0.667
2019-20 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC — 24 4 12 16 0.667
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.67
2019-20 · Fitchburg State
+221.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
28%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10882
Forward overall
#489
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Eric Freschi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hunter Schneider
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2014-15
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Cassidy Bowes
Endicott · 2018-19
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Geisness
Concordia · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.