← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jayden Jensen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2001-02-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 54 0 9 9 0.167 0.0612 0.0661 0.1760 0.1901
2019-20 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 53 2 10 12 0.226 0.0832 0.0832 0.2390 0.2390
2020-21 NAHL 36 0 3 3 0.083 0.0306 0.0306 0.0879 0.0879
2021-22 NAHL 60 1 10 11 0.183 0.0673 0.0628 0.1935 0.1804
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 25 3 6 9 0.360
2024-25 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 26 3 3 6 0.231
2023-24 Lawrence D3 NCHA SO 27 4 8 12 0.444
2022-23 Lawrence D3 NCHA FR 23 4 4 8 0.348
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2022-23 · Lawrence
+474.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23226
Defenseman overall
#3321
Defenseman born in 2001
#6311
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Potsdam · 2003-04
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2013-14
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2021-22
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.