← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ethan Wolthers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 56 7 7 14 0.250 0.1475 0.1569 0.7509 0.7986
2019-20 Wenatchee Wild BCHL 47 7 8 15 0.319 0.1229 0.1229 0.4644 0.4644
2020-21 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 43 7 11 18 0.419 0.1538 0.1538 0.4418 0.4418
2021-22 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 53 18 32 50 0.943 0.3466 0.3305 0.9958 0.9496
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Sacred Heart D1 AHA SR 38 4 5 9 0.237
2024-25 Western Michigan D1 NCHC GR 9 2 2 4 0.444
2023-24 Western Michigan D1 NCHC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Western Michigan D1 NCHC JR 13 2 3 5 0.385
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2022-23 · Western Michigan
+72.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
18%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21039
Forward overall
#1028
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2008-09
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lake Forest · 2002-03
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.