IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Siffringer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-02-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 39 4 8 12 0.308 0.1219 0.1256 0.3231 0.3330
2019-20 Philadelphia Rebels NAHL 54 13 13 26 0.481 0.1908 0.1908 0.5055 0.5055
2020-21 — NAHL 54 3 5 8 0.148 0.0587 0.0587 0.1555 0.1555
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Trinity D3 NESCAC SR 20 2 3 5 0.250
2023-24 Trinity D3 NESCAC JR 30 5 7 12 0.400
2022-23 Trinity D3 NESCAC SO 25 2 7 9 0.360
2021-22 Trinity D3 NESCAC FR 24 1 6 7 0.292
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2021-22 · Trinity
+171.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
78%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#43447
Forward overall
#2423
Forward born in 2000
#4843
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Jordan Boucher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
David Parrottino
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Canisius
0.09 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Storm
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Noel Parker
Gustavus Adolphus · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brien Thompson
Nichols · 2011-12
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Philip Elgstam
Norwich · 2016-17
0.409 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.