← New Search ↗ Social Card

Laker Aldridge Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-01-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 27 6 4 10 0.370 0.1361 0.1465 0.3910 0.4209
2019-20 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 48 8 25 33 0.688 0.2526 0.2526 0.7257 0.7257
2020-21 Fairbanks Ice Dogs NAHL 41 20 7 27 0.658 0.2419 0.2419 0.6950 0.6950
2021-22 Maryland Black Bears NAHL 51 12 13 25 0.490 0.1801 0.1673 0.5174 0.4805
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ohio University ACHA_D1 23 13 23 36 1.565
2024-25 Ohio University ACHA_D1 23 13 23 36 1.565
2023-24 Ohio University ACHA_D1 23 13 23 36 1.565
2022-23 Ohio University ACHA_D1 23 13 23 36 1.565
2021-22 Ohio University ACHA_D1 23 13 23 36 1.565
2020-21 Ohio University ACHA_D1 23 13 23 36 1.565
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.57
2020-21 · Ohio University
+1148.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23096
Forward overall
#1154
Forward born in 2001
#1732
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wentworth · 2023-24
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2014-15
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2016-17
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.