IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

David Breazeale Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-04-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 40 1 6 7 0.175 0.0643 0.0668 0.1850 0.1923
2019-20 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 46 3 14 17 0.370 0.1358 0.1358 0.3906 0.3906
2020-21 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 54 5 16 21 0.389 0.1429 0.1429 0.4110 0.4110
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 38 3 10 13 0.342
2023-24 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 37 2 7 9 0.243
2022-23 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 36 1 12 13 0.361
2021-22 Maine D1 HockeyEast FR 33 2 14 16 0.485
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.48
2021-22 · Maine
+668.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12710
Defenseman overall
#2185
Defenseman born in 2000
#4278
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Phil Boje
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.10 PPG
→ Air Force (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Chris Buchanan
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Bentley (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Maller
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Justin Wade
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dane Cooper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Brown (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andy Singerhouse
St. Thomas · 2008-09
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Stuart Harley
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Remick
Hobart · 2021-22
0.636 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.