← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Lajoie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-10-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 29 2 4 6 0.207 0.0735 0.0819 0.2172 0.2419
2019-20 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 50 7 15 22 0.440 0.1563 0.1563 0.4620 0.4620
2020-21 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 48 18 11 29 0.604 0.2146 0.2146 0.6343 0.6343
2021-22 St. Cloud Norsemen NAHL 60 26 14 40 0.667 0.2368 0.2288 0.7000 0.6763
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Alaska Anchorage D1 11 1 1 2 0.182
2023-24 Alaska Anchorage D1 7 0 4 4 0.571
2022-23 Alaska Anchorage D1 16 3 2 5 0.312
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2022-23 · Alaska Anchorage
+114.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22927
Forward overall
#1134
Forward born in 2001
#1686
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2024-25
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tufts · 2021-22
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2014-15
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.