← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gabe Potyk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-10-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Lone Star Brahmas NAHL 46 1 4 5 0.109 0.0431 0.0458 0.1141 0.1213
2019-20 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 18 13 18 31 1.722 0.3961 0.3961
2020-21 Thunder Hockey Club NCDC 30 13 12 25 0.833 0.4646 0.4646 0.6738 0.6738
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SR 17 8 3 11 0.647
2023-24 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC JR 17 5 1 6 0.353
2022-23 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC SO 19 3 7 10 0.526
2021-22 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 23 7 2 9 0.391
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2021-22 · Saint Mary's (MN)
+898.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11862
Forward overall
#493
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Augsburg · 2002-03
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.053 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2006-07
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.