IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mason Kohn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-11-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier 35 6 16 22 0.629 0.0709 0.0785 0.2134 0.2362
2018-19 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 16 2 2 4 0.250 0.0888 0.0946 0.2637 0.2811
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Tufts D3 NESCAC SR 24 6 7 13 0.542
2021-22 Tufts D3 NESCAC JR 22 2 9 11 0.500
2020-21 Tufts D3 NESCAC SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Tufts D3 NESCAC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#37949
Forward overall
#2031
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Cédric Lacroix
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Maine (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bo Pieper
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lonny Forrester
St. Norbert · 2000-01
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Ford
Elmira · 2013-14
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Bart Moran
Castleton · 2010-11
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.