← New Search ↗ Social Card

Uula Ruikka Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2000-05-28 Country: Finland
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Chicago Steel USHL 53 4 8 12 0.226 0.1392 0.1401 0.6670 0.6713
2019-20 Chicago Steel USHL 42 4 21 25 0.595 0.3659 0.3659 1.7536 1.7536
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Augustana D1 CCHA 24 2 6 8 0.333
2023-24 Augustana D1 CCHA 29 5 9 14 0.483
2022-23 Providence D1 HockeyEast JR 29 1 5 6 0.207
2021-22 Providence D1 HockeyEast SO 32 0 8 8 0.250
2020-21 Providence D1 HockeyEast FR 22 4 4 8 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2020-21 · Providence
+174.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

48%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3693
Defenseman overall
#812
Defenseman born in 2000
#1854
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Brown (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Canisius (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint John's · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2006-07
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.