← New Search ↗ Social Card

Noah Marino Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-04-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 4 0 2 2 0.500 0.1837 0.2088 0.5278 0.5999
2019-20 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 46 2 5 7 0.152 0.0559 0.0559 0.1606 0.1606
2020-21 NAHL 8 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Springfield Jr. Blues NAHL 58 5 10 15 0.259 0.0950 0.0939 0.2730 0.2700
2022-23 NAHL 45 5 3 8 0.178 0.0653 0.0614 0.1877 0.1764
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Trine D3 NCHA GR 6 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Trine D3 NCHA SR 7 2 0 2 0.286
2023-24 Trine D3 NCHA JR 9 0 2 2 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2023-24 · Trine
+216.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20516
Defenseman overall
#3337
Defenseman born in 2002
#5909
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2015-16
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2024-25
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint John's · 2018-19
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.