IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matthew Babineau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 New Hampton NE-Prep 13 1 6 7 0.538 0.1039 0.1039 0.2464 0.2464
2021-22 New Hampton NE-Prep 28 10 11 21 0.750 0.1447 0.1447 0.3432 0.3432
2022-23 New Hampton NE-Prep 35 14 16 30 0.857 0.1653 0.1653 0.3922 0.3922
2023-24 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 35 5 3 8 0.229 0.0528 0.0521 0.1848 0.1824
2024-25 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 39 8 10 18 0.462 0.1067 0.1006 0.3732 0.3518
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Salem State D3 MASCAC — 26 3 7 10 0.385
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2025-26 · Salem State
+453.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
5%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26247
Forward overall
#1492
Forward born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Noah Nemgar
St. Norbert · 2008-09
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Dunagan
Saint John's · 2013-14
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dominic Brenza
Stevenson · 2015-16
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.