IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Passaretti Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-07-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Rochester Monarchs USPHL-Premier 42 1 8 9 0.214 0.0280 0.0278 0.0727 0.0721
2018-19 WB/Scranton Knights EHL 37 5 12 17 0.460 0.1061 0.1017 0.3518 0.3344
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Canton D3 SUNYAC SR 24 0 5 5 0.208
2021-22 Canton D3 SUNYAC JR 21 1 2 3 0.143
2019-20 Canton D1 SUNYAC FR 13 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Canton D3 SUNYAC FR 13 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#13767
Defenseman overall
#2214
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luke Munroe
SUNY Geneseo · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Easton Inglis
Alvernia · 2023-24
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Reid Brown
Gustavus Adolphus · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.