← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Peterson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-01-08 Country: USA
2020 NHL Draft Round 3, Pick #86  ·  St. Louis Blues St. Louis Blues
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 CCHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 NTDP-U18 53 8 21 29 0.547 0.4243 0.4279 2.0366 2.0540
2019-20 NTDP-U18 45 8 17 25 0.556 0.4308 0.4308 2.0679 2.0679
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Boston University D1 HockeyEast JR 35 8 12 20 0.571
2022-23 Boston University D1 HockeyEast SO 39 5 13 18 0.462
2021-22 Boston University D1 HockeyEast FR 29 10 6 16 0.552
2020-21 Boston University D1 HockeyEast 16 3 3 6 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.37
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2020-21 · Boston University
+2.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

70%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#11762
Forward overall
#574
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.81 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Yale (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.34 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Albertus Magnus · 2017-18
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
New England · 2017-18
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Salem State · 2006-07
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.