← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Gavin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-10-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 NCDC 59 7 8 15 0.254 0.1036 0.1104 0.2043 0.2177
2018-19 Northern Cyclones NCDC 40 19 18 37 0.925 0.3771 0.3803
2019-20 Northern Cyclones NCDC 18 15 13 28 1.556 0.6342 0.6342 1.2504 1.2504
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Air Force D1 AHA SR 38 19 17 36 0.947
2022-23 Air Force D1 AHA JR 35 11 11 22 0.629
2021-22 Air Force D1 AHA SO 35 16 13 29 0.829
2020-21 Air Force D1 AHA FR 14 3 5 8 0.571
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.57
2020-21 · Air Force
+145.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
38%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3496
Forward overall
#146
Forward born in 1999
#18
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Boston University (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Connecticut College · 2018-19
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.