← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Yoder Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-05-28 Country: USA
2020 NHL Draft Round 6, Pick #170  ·  Pittsburgh Penguins Pittsburgh Penguins
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 55 9 9 18 0.327 0.2538 0.2608 1.2182 1.2520
2019-20 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 47 10 10 20 0.425 0.3299 0.3299 1.5837 1.5837
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Providence D1 HockeyEast GR 37 5 5 10 0.270
2023-24 Providence D1 HockeyEast SR 35 11 9 20 0.571
2022-23 Providence D1 HockeyEast JR 37 8 7 15 0.405
2021-22 Providence D1 HockeyEast SO 38 5 6 11 0.289
2020-21 Providence D1 HockeyEast FR 25 3 3 6 0.240
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2020-21 · Providence
+7.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#21666
Forward overall
#1183
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Providence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.82 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Boston College (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2004-05
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2005-06
1.258 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wilkes · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.